In this organization, a "specialist" is called a person (and he conducts "examinations") who has not mastered school physics and Russian language courses. From the pearls of the "specialist" Dadkov in the "expert opinion": "To improve the quality of vacuuming, it was decided to increase the bonding time" (the vacuum system in the packaging machine works independently of the sealing system); "performance tests were carried out to study performance"; "To improve the quality of packaging, it was decided to heat carbon dioxide at using a Yato hair dryer" (there was a mixture of nitrogen and carbon dioxide in the cylinder at a pressure of 180 Bar, Dadkov took a technical hair dryer and began to heat the gas reducer with it). To please the customer, Dadkov distorted the facts, indicating the absence of a TR CU certificate (despite its presence), understated the machine's performance settings and wishful thinking to please the customer. One of the positive qualities of the office can be called customer orientation, and the negative ones are low literacy. Such "specialists" at my school in the working-class area were corrected at vocational school after the 8th grade.
I do not advise you to apply. Whatever the seller tells you and recommends this organization, go to the state one. I bought an auto accumulator at the end of last year. Initially it seemed to work strangely. Bad. I thought it might seem. I started the car.This year in January it was freezing, and I was charging before the frost, prevention, he didn't even turn the starter. the seller offered expertise in this office. I was misled by the word forensic in their name. As a result of the examination, the expert did not take my question into consideration. it turned out that the battery was stored somewhere for 10 months before the sale, but the expert ignored this fact in the conclusions (no one canceled the self-discharge of the batteries!), made his assumptions- long-term operation, although he indicated that I only had two months! And then, which is categorically unacceptable to experts, I made an unambiguous conclusion based on my ASSUMPTIONS. I will definitely not leave the question and will return to the work of the expert and his conclusions later, so that they would give an assessment. But it's not professional! uniquely.
Polite staff, immediately listened, gave advice on how to resolve the issue not through them, but by yourself, according to the law because it is possible. but I decided to work through them anyway. Thanks to Yuri Stanislavovich